<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>People and Technology &#187; user interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/category/user-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog</link>
	<description>People, Technology, Business and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Yahoo Pipes &#8211; could do better</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/xml/2007/03/27/yahoo-pipes-could-do-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/xml/2007/03/27/yahoo-pipes-could-do-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Browne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xml]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/xml/2007/03/27/yahoo-pipes-could-do-better/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been playing with Yahoo&#8217;s latest toy &#8211; see Yahoo Pipes in 10 easy steps.
It&#8217;s a very good example of a Web 2 tool. While it is still in beta it already allows you to combine / filter / clone and edit RSS streams. (RSS = a summary of a website, offered by many sites, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been playing with Yahoo&#8217;s latest toy &#8211; see <a href="http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/xml/2007/03/23/yahoo-pipes-in-10-easy-steps-sample-for-iona-dublin/" >Yahoo Pipes in 10 easy steps</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a very good example of a Web 2 tool. While it is still in beta it already allows you to combine / filter / clone and edit RSS streams. (RSS = a summary of a website, offered by many sites, including this one &#8211; just look for the orange logo). In the same way that SQL queries a database, Pipes allows you to query Websites (or to be more precise RSS streams) for the information that you want.</p>
<p>Yahoo Pipes is worth checking out for the following reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>The user interface (finally) puts Gmail to shame. Just how do they generate the dynamic / curvy pipes linking the boxes?</li>
<li>It&#8217;s completely graphic. Users with at a &#8216;power user of Excel&#8217; level can generate streams that would previously have taken an experienced programmer a number of days.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s another piece on the Web2 infrastructure. All other desktop apps have migrated to the web. It was just a matter of time before developer tools did as well. Does it make sense for you? Your call.</li>
</ul>
<p><a target="_blank" title="Link to Yahoo Pipes" href="http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/pipes.yahoo.com');"><img alt="Yahoo Pipes Logo" title="Yahoo Pipes Logo" src="http://l.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/pps/logo_1.gif" /></a><br />
Pipes, for the reasons below, is <strong>not</strong> yet going to displace teams of Java people who do nothing but code RSS streams all day. Before, the choice on many IT projects was Build , Buy or use Open Source (or various combinations of those three). Online Web 2 apps and services (of which pipes is only one example) gives a fourth option to put into the mix.  So what does Yahoo pipes need to overcome the &#8216;toy&#8217; label and become a &#8217;serious&#8217; option for IT projects?</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The problem is, it&#8217;s free. </strong>How do Yahoo intend making money out of Pipes? More accurately , will they make enough money so that my project can still use it in 3 years time.</li>
<li><strong>You&#8217;re stuck with Yahoo.</strong> If you build against pipes, you&#8217;re stuck with them. Even in the database world, it is possible, if expensive, to switch product supplier. I&#8217;d love Yahoo to open source pipes to solve this dilemma, and allow them to build a business around the &#8216;pipes hosting&#8217; part.</li>
<li><strong>It&#8217;s completely graphic.</strong> This is mainly a good thing  but no doubt most developers would still like the option to see and edit the generated code.</li>
<li><strong>It&#8217;s hard to extend</strong>. If there is a way of extending it with my own &#8216;widgets&#8217; , then I missed it. I can host RSS-generating code on my own server, but this detracts from pipes overall ease of use.</li>
</ul>
<p>What do you think &#8211; will Yahoo Pipes take off , or be quietly abandonded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/xml/2007/03/27/yahoo-pipes-could-do-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your favourite colour &#8211; what should be in our new web site design?</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/location/dublin/2007/03/14/your-favourite-colour-what-should-be-in-our-new-web-site-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/location/dublin/2007/03/14/your-favourite-colour-what-should-be-in-our-new-web-site-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Browne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dublin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedPiranha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/location/dublin/2007/03/14/your-favourite-colour-what-should-be-in-our-new-web-site-design/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Eoghan, there are going to be some changes around here. He&#8217;s just announced that we&#8217;re the winner of the 2000 Euro worth of web design work. For a sample of his work , check out the redesign that he has done of the Barcamp Dublin site.
I actually tried to convince Eoghan to pick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Eoghan, there are going to be some changes around here. He&#8217;s just announced that we&#8217;re the winner of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.eoghanmccabe.com/naive-by-design/and-the-winner-of-e2000-of-web-design-work-is/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.eoghanmccabe.com');">2000 Euro worth of web design work</a>. For a sample of his work , check out the redesign that he has done of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.barcampdublin.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.barcampdublin.com');">Barcamp Dublin</a> site.</p>
<p>I actually tried to convince Eoghan to pick somebody else with even more readers (in a mercenary get some more exposure kind of way). He&#8217;s sticking with the person choosen by his random number omiter.<br />
<a href="http://www.eoghanmccabe.com/naive-by-design/and-the-winner-of-e2000-of-web-design-work-is/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.eoghanmccabe.com');"><img alt="Winner" id="image398" src="http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/winner2.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>So the question is, What&#8217;s your favourite colour? What part of this website do you think needs an upgrade &#8211; this <a href="http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/" >blog</a>, the main <a href="http://www.firstpartners.net" >FirstPartners.net &#8216;Corporate site&#8217;</a>, or the <a href="http://www.firstpartners.net/kb" >wiki / knowledgebase</a>? What changes do you think should be made?Or should I save the prize for the forthcoming mad, take over the world attempt part 2 (<a target="_blank" href="http://red-piranha.sourceforge.net/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/red-piranha.sourceforge.net');">Red Piranha</a>)?</p>
<p>Further Kudos to Eoghan for carrying out some Charity work as well: <a href="http://www.tuppenceworth.ie/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.tuppenceworth.ie');">tuppenceworth.ie</a>, entered by <a href="http://www.tuppenceworth.ie/blog/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.tuppenceworth.ie');">Simon McGarr</a>, the other is a project by <a href="http://www.iqcontent.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.iqcontent.com');">IQ Content</a> for the <a href="http://www.lcac.ie/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.lcac.ie');">Red Door School</a>, entered by <a href="http://www.iqcontent.com/blog/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.iqcontent.com');">Laurence Veale</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/location/dublin/2007/03/14/your-favourite-colour-what-should-be-in-our-new-web-site-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not a Web 2.0 Company &#8211; Scandanavian Airlines</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/people/cv/2006/06/12/not-a-web-20-company-scandanavian-airlines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/people/cv/2006/06/12/not-a-web-20-company-scandanavian-airlines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Browne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EnterpriseWeb2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/people/cv/2007/01/10/not-a-web-20-company-scandanavian-airlines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t think these guys will be joining the Web2Ireland (even Web 2.0) group anytime soon. Basically , their website says ‘We couldn’t be bothered using any of the Ajax toolkits out there, so we’ll get you Mr Customer to do all the work for us’. I wonder what their look-to-book ratio is ( I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think these guys will be joining the Web2Ireland (even Web 2.0) group anytime soon. Basically , their website says ‘We couldn’t be bothered using any of the <a href="http://www.firstpartners.net/red-piranha/knowledgebase/AjaxJavaLibraries?show_comments=1" >Ajax toolkits</a> out there, so we’ll get you Mr Customer to do all the work for us’. I wonder what their look-to-book ratio is ( I used to do some work for <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbrowne" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.linkedin.com');">Aer Lingus &#8211; LinkedIn Profile</a>).</p>
<p><strong> Scandanavian Airlines (SAS) Website</strong>.</p>
<p>Hint to SAS: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.firstpartners.net/whitepapers/Sprinkle_some_Ajax_Magic_into_your_Struts_application.pdf" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/downloads/whitepapers/Sprinkle_some_Ajax_Magic_into_your_Struts_application.pdf');">Here is how to fix this (pdf)</a>, or hire us and we’ll fix it for you.</p>
<p>Or if you prefer , reassure yourself that <a href="http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/location/dublin/2005/11/10/websites-without-ajax/" >you’re not the only airline with Ajax problems</a>.<br />
<a href="http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/category/web/ajax/" >More blogposts on Ajax.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/people/cv/2006/06/12/not-a-web-20-company-scandanavian-airlines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another announcement from Google</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/web/2006/06/08/another-announcement-from-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/web/2006/06/08/another-announcement-from-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Browne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/web/2006/06/08/another-announcement-from-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Google Blog:
Google Browser Sync for Firefox is an extension that continuously synchronizes your browser settings â€“ including bookmarks, history, persistent cookies, and saved passwords â€“ across your computers. It also allows you to restore open tabs and windows across different machines and browser sessions. For more info, please visit our

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">From the Google Blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>Google Browser Sync for Firefox is an extension that continuously synchronizes your browser settings â€“ including bookmarks, history, persistent cookies, and saved passwords â€“ across your computers. It also allows you to restore open tabs and windows across different machines and browser sessions. For more info, please visit our</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/tools/firefox/browsersync/index.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');"><img src="http://www.google.com/tools/firefox/common/labs_logo.gif" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/web/2006/06/08/another-announcement-from-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Yahoo or Google have more Style?</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/web/2006/05/24/does-yahoo-or-google-have-more-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/web/2006/05/24/does-yahoo-or-google-have-more-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 07:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Browne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/web/2006/05/24/does-yahoo-or-google-have-more-style/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to start another open-ended user-interface debate &#8211; which has a better user interface : Yahoo , with everything on one page , or Google’s easy to use simplicity?
My own view is that casual users prefer Google, but if you’re using a site day-in day-out you’ll take the time to learn the more complex Yahoo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">Just to start another open-ended user-interface debate &#8211; which has a better user interface : Yahoo , with everything on one page , or Google’s easy to use simplicity?<a href="http://www.yahoo.ie" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.yahoo.ie');"><img title="Yahoo Logo" alt="Yahoo Logo" src="http://eur.i1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/i/eu/hp/yuk1.gif" /></a></p>
<p>My own view is that casual users prefer Google, but if you’re using a site day-in day-out you’ll take the time to learn the more complex Yahoo style.</p>
<p>The latest post on <a target="_blank" href="http://dehora.net/journal/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/dehora.net');">Bill de HOra’s blog</a> has more.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpartners.net/blog/technology/web/2006/05/24/does-yahoo-or-google-have-more-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
